Pandas have
become the accepted symbol for the preservation of wildlife. You see them everywhere: t-shirts, book bags,
totes, bumper stickers, and occasionally a bits and pieces on the black market. They’re probably the most popular animal on the
planet (It would be us, but Jeff is just insufferable). Everybody thinks that they’re so
great, but I’m here to tell you that they’re not. We are sending the wrong message about
pandas. They should be disposed of, not
kept alive. This is because they
threaten the international balance of power, they are terrible animals, and it
would happen naturally.
China
already has way too much power. It is
the most populous country in the world.
They have one of the few economies in the world that isn’t worse than
Nicholas Cage’s acting career. The U.S.
owes China over
$1.4 trillion, or roughly five billion times the value of Texas. If
all that isn’t enough, they get pandas.
A country having a panda is like a high school kid having a
Ferrari. No matter how lame you are, you can screw anyone you want and totally get away with it. Can you imagine what some of the world’s
lamer countries might do for a panda?
Rumor has it that China
plans to acquire more nuclear weapons by exchanging a panda for some of North
Korea’s.
It’s not fair to the rest of the world.
What has any other country got?
All the good animals like lions, elephants, giraffes, and Red Cross Workers are in Africa, but the civil
wars make them impossible to get to. We tried to compete by sending our
national animal, Richard Nixon, to China. Unfortunately, he was returned after he
viciously mauled several Chinese government officials and gave them
rabies. If we eliminate pandas, we take
away China’s
most powerful diplomatic tool. China’s
influence is not the only issue. We
should also destroy pandas because they pretty much suck.
Pandas are
lame. There is simply no better way to
say it. There are so, so many better
animals. There are eagles, tigers,
sharks, giraffes, polar bears. That’s right;
pandas aren’t even the coolest bear. The
few animals that they are better than are really lame, like American Idol judges. Sure, the animals from that
list are all terrifying killing-machines that slaughter with no remorse, but
make no mistake, so are pandas. They’re
just either really lazy or extremely cunning.
Modern media has portrayed these awful creatures as cute and cuddly,
like giant teddy bears. Well,
what happens when an eight-year-old decides to try hugging one? If that kid gets within five feet of
the panda, you might as well start brainstorming ideas for what you want to do with their soon-to-be unoccupied room. There are not enough Tide To Go pens to fix what's about to happen. We might as
well end them, because it should have happened long ago.
Extinction
is not a new thing in nature. In fact,
over 99% of species that have lived no longer exist. Now, I can understand trying to save the
animals we turned into dog food a few many times, but pandas are a completely
different matter. Those damn hippies can shut up about their endangerment being out fault; nature clearly wants them to die too.
Look at how amazingly killable these things are. They’re fat, slow and somewhat
dim-witted. They’re the Kevin James of
animals. I think I could take one. Right now, it’s like keeping an entire species
on life support, and now it’s time to pull the plug. Also, considering all humanity does, you’d
think the pandas could put in a tiny bit of effort, but no. Honestly, I think octogenarians have sex more
often than pandas. I’ll let you enjoy
that image for a moment. Panda sex is
like meteor showers; it happens very infrequently and it’s not really that
interesting to watch. Lots of other
animals like having sex. As anyone who
has gone to a zoo can tell you, that’s how monkeys spend most of their time. Koalas seriously have a problem with
Chlamydia. It’s all D-bags with soul patches talk about. The point is, the fact that pandas don’t want
to have sex shows us that they have given up as a species. Well, if they don’t care, why should we?
If you
haven’t figured out what the solution for this speech is going to be, you
should probably go the way of the pandas.
What I suggest is that we just leave them be. A nice combination of nature and
industrialism were taking care of them quite adequately before anyone
noticed. It will take literally no
effort.
Some people
still think pandas should be saved. To
those people, I have a simple suggestion.
Go to a zoo and hug a panda.
Then, consider your position on this issue during your last few hellish
seconds of life as the panda rips you open and begins snacking on your vital
organs. Sound like fun? That’s what I thought.
We should
just let the pandas die. They give an
already powerful China
far too much power and forced us to put Nixon down. Pandas only act cute so they can disembowel
and eat children for amusement. If not
for us, other animals would have killed them long, long ago. As a parting thought, imagine where the world
would be without pandas? Pretty much the
same, isn’t it?
No comments:
Post a Comment